Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Storytelling is important for the proliferation of societies!

Kate Aronson
Storytelling for New Media
Adam Brackin
April 27, 2010

KatesEpicStory

Stories have been shared since humans muttered their first syllables. It is the method by which we communicate our feelings, our perceptions and our experiences. Story telling is essential for the development of concepts, religions, even societies as a whole. Storytelling is often fun, collaborative and inspiring. Upon initialization of my own storytelling process, these were the attributes I wanted to implement in the development of my own project. In addition to a collaborative effort, I wanted to employ a strategy using social media and emergent properties. Thus, I fell upon the concept of KatesEpicStory.

During the brainstorming process I knew it would be in the story’s best interest to implement a plan using social media. Because of the sheer numbers of users on platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, I thought the project would be easier to advertise and execute if it were on a medium users were already comfortable with. I also knew I wanted interactivity within my in order to make the process more entertaining for users. My first iteration included a pre-made story, which would be hyped up using real-world elements such as t-shirts and flyers. After the initial hype, I would slowly release parts of the story via microblogging platforms such as Twitter and Facebook status updates. I eventually threw this idea out because I foresaw users not sticking around; I knew it didn’t have enough interactivity to keep the attention span of my cohorts. I then came upon a plan which used a well-balanced mixture of social media, interactivity, and emergent properties. I wanted to hone in on the creativity of the masses, so I devised a course of action to utilize each of these elements, and I called this method KatesEpicStory.

I chose the name KatesEpicStory because I wanted it to be distinctive enough to remember, yet something familiar enough so that people would participate. I chose to eliminate the spaces in the title as the quality of distinction. This also made branding the story easier because website URLs and Twitter handles do not have spaces. I used my name in the title as something familiar, because I knew my friends would trust what I was asking them to do something constructive. I wanted to use epic in the name because that is exactly the direction I wanted the story to go, and luckily, that is the exact direction it went.

Understanding the importance of visual literacy, I wanted to choose a graphic which would be eye-catching and easy to remember. I wasn’t sure what to use, but I stumbled upon a funny and slightly ambiguous drawing of a man in a suit with a plastic bag over his head. I liked the color scheme and thought it would be a good branding tool for my story. The artist was David Creighton-Pester, a graphic designer based out of Hamilton, New Zealand. After efforts of contacting him for permission to use his graphic turned out to be unsuccessful, I chose to use the graphic anyways, but sited the source on the side of the image. I was satisfied with the graphic, but I added a purple background and text which read “KatesEpicStory” in order to brand my story further. I even made the graphic my personal profile picture on Facebook to both create hype and allow users to make the connection between the story and the brand. It worked, because the storytelling process was more successful than I had originally predicted.

KatesEpicStory consists of a short introduction from which users could add their own variations of what came next in the story. The effort was a general success; 21 people added to the story, and it ended up being an interestingly messy collaboration. The story itself was all over the board. The main character’s name was Sammy, and the story began with him in his room, cleaning up a pile of dirty clothes. The story then turns to Sammy falling downward, cascading into a world of pigs. This world was equipped with a Scientologist Kraken, a hot-air balloon, Sammy’s junkie father, and an elephant named Brainy Jim. The story came to a literary pause when Sammy was awoken from his dream, so I continued the story by adding a chapter two. This chapter didn’t get as many entries as the first chapter, but it allowed the story to end in a logically entertaining manner. Overall, this story was absolutely a pleasure to read, and through this experience I have learned that collaborative creativity is a positively useful tool.

As a whole, this project was quite a cool experience. It has shown me that anyone can tell a story, and that tapping into the creativity of the masses is easy, and allows users to feel part of something that is bigger than them. The overall purpose of the project was fulfilled in my eyes, mainly because of the engaging response of users. It turned out to be a success because I used platforms such as Facebook that were familiar to the people I wanted to participate. I also advertised on Facebook, Twitter, and Blogger with hyperlinks to the story, so it would be easy to access. I chose a graphic, which was funny and slightly ambiguous, so that people could gain interest in and remember the story. I was surprised at how little I had to advertise the process in order for it to gain momentum. The secret was to make it easy for users to link to the story, read, and add their own input. Overall, this was really interesting, and I would like to see how I can implement creative collaboration in the future with other media.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Question: Music may be art, but it is also big business. To what degree do you think independent artists actually have a shot at "making it" today?

If we are going to answer this question properly, we must first explore what the term "making it" actually entails. It could really mean a variety of things, ranging anywhere from making it to the top 40 charts or winning a Grammy to selling out your first venue or showing up on a college radio station. If it were my band, I would probably just be happy with the latter two options, but the positions of the authors of the book would say otherwise.

First, I will touch on my opinion on the matter. Ever since 10th grade, I have been listening to music that generally can't be heard on the radio; "indie" music, if you will. Now, this "indie" music in my opinion has always risen above the quality of music that I find on the top-40 radio stations, as it is safe to say that the usual top-40 stuff sounds alike. From my personal experience of only listening to "indie" music, I would have to say that yes, independent artists do have a chance at getting big, it just may not be the usual direction as, say a top-40 artist would take.

Take the band The Flaming Lips for example. The group formed in 1983, releasing their debut album in 1986. The band is still together, and just released two full-length albums in 2009 (Embryonic, and a cover album of Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon). Their song "Do You Realize??" was also unanimously voted as the official rock song of Oklahoma (due to the band's formation and residency in OK City). With all of this sucess, during the Flaming Lips' history, I have yet to hear any of their singles on any top-40 radio station. The band has also been awarded only three Grammys during their 27 year history. Yet, does this define them as unsuccessful? In my opinion, it does not.

The Flaming Lips would have sided with Chuck Salter in his argument that there is a way behind the power of the record company promoters. Salter and John Legend agree that there are ways to get around the music conglomerates; especially with the rise of Web 2.0 and the extended use of social networking, music and media blogs, and digital transfer of music files. Boehlert argues that radio has become ridden with cookie-cutter music, and that this problem is due to record promoters influencing radio's choice of music.

I agree with Boehlert, the radio has become overwhelmed with music that is no longer creative; it all sounds the same, with the same catchy beat that's fun to dance to. If what he says is accurate, that the indie promoters of the music world are bringing the industry down, then I say, artists who actually want to make music for the sake of music (think, The Mountain Goats, Neutral Milk Hotel), then by all means, find another way to pay the bills. Don't rely on the potential of "making it big" (think, Brittany Spears, U2) by intelligently using the internet.

Radiohead for example, is another extremely well-respected band who has been together since 1985. They have won three Grammys for "Best Alternative Album", and even sold their last album In Rainbows via digital media outlets, allowing customers to set their own price. The band sold three million copies of their album, all without a record label (on the digital media). Radiohead's front man Thom Yorke told Time, "I like the people at our record company, but the time is at hand when you have to ask why anyone needs one. And, yes, it probably would give us some perverse pleasure to say 'Fuck you' to this decaying business model."

Even Yorke agrees that the music is more about the business than the music. In conclusion, you asked if independent musicians can make it big within the music market today. My simple answer: yes, they surely can, but it will take much patience, and a strategic utilization of internet and information resources.